智庫(kù)評(píng)價(jià)模式與區(qū)域智庫(kù)影響力評(píng)價(jià)研究

摘要： 在對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)智庫(kù)評(píng)價(jià)體系比較的基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)建五維度區(qū)域智庫(kù)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,采用熵權(quán)—TOPSIS評(píng)價(jià)模型,開展區(qū)域智庫(kù)影響力評(píng)價(jià)。區(qū)域智庫(kù)影響力差序格局與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平存在密切的關(guān)聯(lián)關(guān)系,區(qū)域智庫(kù)影響力的五個(gè)維度都表現(xiàn)較好的省份主要分布在東部沿海經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū),西部地區(qū)相對(duì)排名靠后;有些省份五個(gè)維度排名變動(dòng)幅度較小,而有些省份排名變動(dòng)幅度較較大;省市區(qū)間智庫(kù)影響力得分差距巨大,從大到小呈梯度分布狀態(tài)。
On the basis of comparing the evaluation system of domestic think tanks, a five-dimensional regional think tank evaluation index system is constructed, the TOPSIS evaluation model is used, and the influence evaluation of regional think tank is carried out. There is a close correlation between the differential order pattern of influence of regional think tanks and the level of regional economic development. The provinces with good influence in the five dimensions and the comprehensive ranking are mainly distributed in the eastern coastal economically developed areas, and the western areas are relatively lower; some provinces have a smaller change in the five dimensions ranking, while some provinces have a larger change in the ranking.