論從學(xué)術(shù)研究到智庫(kù)研究的轉(zhuǎn)化機(jī)制

摘要： [目的/意義]我國(guó)新型智庫(kù)建設(shè)起步較晚,多數(shù)智庫(kù)機(jī)構(gòu)是從學(xué)術(shù)機(jī)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)換而來(lái),仍然沿襲傳統(tǒng)學(xué)術(shù)模式,所以導(dǎo)致了智庫(kù)研究存在偏學(xué)術(shù)輕政策的問(wèn)題。[方法/過(guò)程]文章從學(xué)術(shù)研究和智庫(kù)研究的內(nèi)涵出發(fā),分析出兩者之間的9個(gè)相同點(diǎn)和10個(gè)不同點(diǎn)。[結(jié)果/結(jié)論]就學(xué)術(shù)研究與智庫(kù)研究的10個(gè)不同點(diǎn)給出了學(xué)術(shù)研究轉(zhuǎn)化為智庫(kù)研究的具體措施建議,期望為學(xué)術(shù)機(jī)構(gòu)向智庫(kù)轉(zhuǎn)型過(guò)程中存在的偏學(xué)術(shù)輕政策問(wèn)題提供一些解決方案。
[Purpose/significance]The construction of new think tanks in China started relatively late. Most think tank institutions have evolved from academic institutions and still follow the traditional academic patterns. This leads to the problem of preference to academics over policies in think tank research. [Method/process] This paper starts from the connotation of academic research and think tank research,and figures out nine similarities and ten differences between the two kinds of research. [Result/conclusion] The paper proposes concrete suggestions for the transformation from academic research to think tank research in terms of the ten different points,and hopes to provide some solutions for the problem of preference to academics over policies in the transformation process.