中外典型智庫(kù)建設(shè)比較研究

摘要： [目的/意義]分析成熟智庫(kù)的建設(shè)框架與內(nèi)容,能夠?yàn)槲覈?guó)智庫(kù)建設(shè)實(shí)踐提供理論依據(jù)和方案藍(lán)圖。[方法/過程]選擇國(guó)際知名智庫(kù)作為典型案例,從功能定位、資源要素、管理方式、成果評(píng)估、成果宣傳、制度保障六個(gè)方面,對(duì)比分析中外智庫(kù)的建設(shè)情況,由此發(fā)現(xiàn)中外智庫(kù)建設(shè)的差異性。[結(jié)果/結(jié)論]根據(jù)對(duì)充分案例的深入對(duì)比分析結(jié)果,我們可以看到,建設(shè)一家能夠充分發(fā)揮功能作用、實(shí)現(xiàn)發(fā)展目標(biāo)的智庫(kù)機(jī)構(gòu),應(yīng)該從功能定位、資源籌備、管理創(chuàng)新、制度保障等幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行,其建設(shè)的根本原則是注重研究質(zhì)量和信譽(yù)。
[Purpose/Significance]Analyzing the construction framework and content of the mature think tank will provide a theoretical basis and blueprint for the construction of China's National Agricultural think tanks.[Method/Process]The article chooses the international well-known think tank as a typical case,and compares and analyzes the construction of Chinese and foreign think tanks from six aspects of function orientation,resource elements,management mode,achievement evaluation,achievement publicity and system guarantee,and finds the difference between Chinese and foreign think tanks.[Result/Conclusion]According to the thorough comparative analysis of the sufficient cases,we can see that the construction of a think tank,which can give full play to its function and realize its development goals,should be carried out in several aspects,such as function orientation,resource preparation,management innovation and system guarantee.The fundamental principle of its construction should be to pay attention to the study of quality and reputation.